![]() I've tried disabling SecureNAT and using a bridge instead. I tried it on AMD CPUs that wouldn't have the Intel spectre fix, the latest version of Ubuntu with the latest version of SoftEther (I just tried again today) and even tried on LAN and still am getting 10-20% of my line speed over 1gbps connection. I'm sorry to take so long to reply to this, but I'm still having trouble. ![]() gh_AbilityĪre the other VPN protocols THAT SLOW that Softether's "fast" is still 20% of line speed? Why is this so, if it's not the CPU? What else can I do to improve this? Especially because of documentation like this. I'm reasonably certain it's not the encryption/decryption, and it's something with SoftEther. HTTPS transfers from these servers go at full line speed, which are also encrypted. I got approximately 20-25% of the line speed. The local machine was 1 hop away from my test machine. I also tried a 4-core CPU w/ 2GB of ram physically located on my local network, and STILL had significantly worse speeds. I believe it's not the encryption that's the bottleneck. I just tried a 6-core CPU with 16 GB of ram (both are 1gbps) and the result is mostly unchanged. That's a single-core CPU with 1GB of ram. The CPU on the server tops out around 30-50% when I test. ![]() I think you should celebrate with 30MBit, i have 2Mbit You think crypting/decrypring needs no time?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |